Discussion about this post

User's avatar
A Texas Libertarian's avatar

"Some say that the problem with libertarianism or anarchism is that it is similar to communism in that the latter says everyone should have equal wealth while the former says everyone should have equal sovereignty and both are impossible and are dangerous to attempt. However, just as capitalism makes it possible to produce goods so cheaply that anyone can buy them, innovative technologies and business models might make sovereignty so inexpensive that any person or tiny community can buy it."

The way I see it, in the libertarian world we would not all have equal sovereignty, but a diverse array of sovereign organizations and situations. If we join a private defense company or private law association, then we have transferred our sovereignty to these groups, as least temporarily. A person's sovereignty could be split among several different organizations. If you separate yourself from this sort of extra-personal legal protection, then you regain your sovereignty. The libertarian world may have these sorts of sovereign individuals, but I think most would gladly transfer this to a good business or association in return for the benefits of professional legal and physical protection. For instance, if you were your own sovereign and somebody robbed or attacked you, you'd have no one but yourself to help bring this person or persons to justice for their actions. Most people would not be capable of this.

What the libertarian world would recognize in a legal sense, however, is the equal right of respect of one another's personal bodies and personal property. The NAP would be an underlying law between and within all private law groups. Each law group could have a myriad of laws on top of the NAP which may seem 'unlibertarian' (price control laws, product prohibitions, social prohibitions, religious laws, racial discrimination, etc.), but this is perfectly fine from a libertarian perspective, because all these additional laws would have been voluntarily agreed to by each group's members personally.

So in this sense, the libertarian future may look nothing like many modern libertarians have envisioned. There could still be a lack of free trade. Porn and prostitution could be outlawed. Even fiat money is a possibility. I guess my point is that it will be hard to predict this stateless future.

Expand full comment
A Texas Libertarian's avatar

"Perhaps the only way to have small communities each managing their own affairs is for an empire to maintain peace among them and protect them from foreign threats"

Or you could have the Roman Catholic Church.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts